ALS Reversals

Some times people with ALS get better

Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)

RCH4

by

RCH4 is an unlicensed, unapproved product reported to “probably slow the progression of your ALS” (6) on a website. The only peer reviewed publication we found on this product is a single abstract which was never presented at a meeting. We have been unable to determine RCH4’s structure or chemical class, and its purported mechanism is one that has never been shown to be useful in treating PALS before. We have been unable to independently verify RCH4’s reported efficacy or even safety. Thus, at this time, we cannot advise PALS to use this product. We hope the proponents of RCH4 will someday present more useful information about their product at a scientific meeting or in a peer reviewed publication.

We believe that regulatory oversight is important for optimizing patient safety on experimental drugs, and that independent peer review and replication are fundamentals of good science. Caution should be exercised around any product being developed and in clinical use without these safeguards and fundamentals in place.

Click here to download the complete review.

Resveratrol

by

Resveratrol is a dietary supplement that likely activates SIRT1 cellular pathways and may alter the gut microbiome. These are interesting mechanisms that may potentially alter the progression of ALS and do confer benefit in animal models of one type of familial ALS; however, to-date, there have been no trials of resveratrol in PALS. Some trials in other populations show frequent gastrointestinal adverse events, including weight loss, and one trial showed a high risk of serious renal toxicity. Given the unknown benefit of resveratrol in PALS and the possible risks, we cannot recommend resveratrol as an ALS treatment at this time. We hope to see well-designed clinical trials of resveratrol and other SIRT1 modulators in the near future.

Click here to download the complete review.

RT001

by

RT001 has a novel mechanism for reducing oxidative stress that could theoretically work better than more traditional antioxidants. In the small trial of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia, it seems to be safe and well-tolerated at lower dosages but can cause nausea and diarrhea at higher doses. At the time of this writing, there is very little efficacy or safety data in PALS. An expanded access program is underway which allows PALS at certain clinics to try this compound free of charge. Data resulting from this expanded access program will help the planning of a possible future clinical trial.‌‌‌

Click here to download the complete review.

Antiretrovirals

by

Antiretrovirals are a group of diverse drugs developed for HIV infections that vary widely in theoretical efficacy against HERVs, side effect profiles, and cost. HERV expression is apparently increased in some PALS; however, it is unknown if this is a
beneficial, neutral, or pathological process. Furthermore, it is not clear if ARV-targeted mechanisms such as cell infection and viral replication are taking place in PALS. Based on the lack of evidence for use of ARVs in PALS who test negative for HIV and HTLV, we cannot recommend them as a treatment for ALS. We look forward to the results of the two ongoing trials of ARVs in PALS.

Click here to download the complete review.

Copper ATSM

by

Copper dysregulation may play a role in ALS progression, particularly for the form caused by SOD1 mutations. Given the complexity of this problem, simple copper supplements are unlikely to be useful to PALS with normal serum copper levels. We do not recommend using these. CuATSM, on the other hand, has more promising potential mechanisms of action, and several positive pre-clinical studies in mutant SOD1 ALS models. There are even a small number of PALS reporting benefits from it, though in our opinion the described benefits are thus far of uncertain clinical significance. At this time, the safety of repeated doses of CuATSM is unknown, as is the optimum daily dose, and it appears to be very expensive. Until trials clarify dosing and safety, as well as effectiveness in patients with and without SOD1 mutations, we do not recommend using CuATSM for ALS.‌‌‌‌

Click here to download the complete review.

GM604

by

At this time ALSUntangled finds no independently verifiable data supporting the efficacy or even the safety of GM604 in patients with ALS. We believe that independent peer review and replication are fundamentals of good science (36,37). Accordingly, we share the FDA’s April 2015 opinion that the data on GM604 in ALS should be released now for

independent peer review (38). If these preliminary data are confirmed to be positive, statistics on the false-positive rate of small trials (29,30) and consensus ALS trial guidelines (35) dictate that they be replicated in a larger, longer duration study before GM604 is deemed effective or even safe for patients with ALS.‌‌

ALSUntangled generally supports the use of expanded access programs during ALS drug development. We believe that these should be reserved for treatments that have at least some independently verifiable safety data. In our opinion, that is not the case with GM604, so we feel that expanded access is premature at this time. When we can independently verify safety data, we hope to see a GM604 group expanded access program that has transparent entry criteria, systematic objective outcome measures, full disclosure of results, and, as suggested by the FDA, allows for a sponsor’s cost recovery but not for profit (39).‌‌‌

Click here to download the complete review.

Endotherapia

by

Endotherapia has a proposed mechanism that hinges on the ability of an isolated laboratory’s immunoblots to identify the cause and specific pathways that are driving ALS progression. In our opinion this ability has never been convincingly demonstrated. While there is a flawed animal study supporting the utility of Endotherapia in rats, such studies rarely translate into useful human treatments (29). The data on Endotherapia in PALS have so many problems that we believe they are uninterpretable. ALSUntangled does not recommend the use of Endotherapia for ALS at this time. A reasonable next step would be a study to validate the utility of the above-described immunoblots, ideally by a group without a potential conflict of interest.

Click here to download the complete review.

Cannabis

by

Cannabis has biological properties including immunomodulation and effects on excitototoxicity that suggest it could be useful in ALS. Evidence from small, non-randomized, unblinded animal studies suggest that it could potentially slow ALS progression, and anecdotal reports suggest that it could ameliorate troubling ALS symptoms. Given all this, ALSUntangled supports further careful study of cannabis and cannabinoids, the active ingredients contained therein. Natural cannabis, as a single agent, provides advantages similar to a multiple drug trial given its numerous mechanisms of action. A possible next step would be a small case series of well-characterized PALS using cannabis at controlled dosages that could potentially be monitored by blood levels of cannabinoids, compared to matched controls, performed in a geographic area where it would be legal.